Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Candy Darling · 26-05-09, 11:05

Åh! De vil jeg ha! Hvor?

Candy Darling · 26-05-09, 11:06

Og hvis noen har noe dritt på Puma, så vil jeg ikke vite det.

Tallulah · 26-05-09, 11:21

Det er noe dritt på alle sneakerprodusentene.

Maverick · 26-05-09, 11:26

Opprinnelig lagt inn av glitterchick, her.

Det er noe dritt på alle sneakerprodusentene.

Ssssh.

Tallulah · 26-05-09, 11:27

Ethiscore hadde en test i fjor, tror jeg det var. Tror Adidas faktisk kom dårligere ut enn Nike. Siden er nede nå, så jeg får ikke sjekket.

Maverick · 26-05-09, 11:28

Altså, Glitter!

Jammen.

Tallulah · 26-05-09, 11:31

Jeg fant oversikten fra i fjor sommer:

Gola trainers10.5
Puma trainers10
Saucony trainers9.5
Umbro trainers9.5
ASICS trainers9
Mizuno trainers9
New Balance trainers9
Ellesse trainers8.5
Skechers trainers8.5
Fila trainers8
Hi-Tec trainers8
Nike trainers8
Adidas trainers5.5
Brooks trainers5.5
Reebok trainers5.5
The ratings on this scorecard were last updated from our database at www.ethiscore.org on 22 May 2008. The higher the rating, the more ethical the brand.

Puma er derfor ikke så ille.

NB! Dette er trainers, ikke sneakers da, jeg har også sett en oversikt hvor flere grønne skomerker er representert. Ethletic blant annet.

Tallulah · 26-05-09, 11:59

Nå fant jeg listen over fashiontrainers / sneakers også, den er ganske lik, men da med noen andre helt på topp:
Ethletic Trainers [A] [F]17
Blackspot sneaker [A] [O]16.5
No Sweat Hemp baseball boots [A] [O]15
Worn Again Trainer [S]14.5
No Sweat sneakers [A]14
VIVO Barefoot trainers Liu12.5
Gola trainers10.5
Puma trainers10
Umbro trainers9.5
ASICS trainers9
New Balance trainers9
Ellesse trainers8.5
Skechers trainers8.5
Fila trainers8
Hi-Tec trainers8
Nike trainers8
Adidas trainers5.5
Brooks trainers5.5
Reebok trainers5.5

Candy Darling · 26-05-09, 12:27

Men Puma har 10-ish på begge, som er ganske bra?

Tallulah · 26-05-09, 12:34

Opprinnelig lagt inn av Scarlett, her.

Men Puma har 10-ish på begge, som er ganske bra?

Nja, relativt så er det jo det. Men på andre skalaer så ser man at bunnen er 10, så de har ikke alt på stell, nei.

Sitat:

We asked all the companies on the table for their supply chain policy. None of the major brands supplied us with a code that would receive our top rating as none has committed to paying workers “a living wage”. This is defined as one which for a full-time working week, without overtime, is enough for workers and their families to meet their needs for nutritious food, clean water, shelter, clothes, education, health care and transport and allows a small amount for discretionary spending.(2,3) Most companies state that they will pay “legal national minimum wages” or “industry benchmark standards”. The problem is that in many cases, neither come close to meeting basic needs.(3)
In addition, many companies do not yet have adequate third-party monitoring in place. Some also use vague terms which can be interpreted in a number of ways - such as setting a maximum working week, “except in exceptional circumstances”. Where one is set, the maximum is most commonly 48 hours, plus 12 hours overtime. Some might argue that these hours are already excessive, and indeed the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Federation is campaigning for a 40 hour working week in developing countries.
Violations

Unfortunately, the existence of a code is no guarantee that it is being implemented. Violations of codes include excessive or forced overtime, inadequate wages, harassment and bullying of workers, discrimination and intimidation.(1,2,3) Violations have been found in factories supplying products for most of the companies on our table, including: Nike, Adidas, Puma, Skechers, New Balance, Reebok, Umbro, Pentland Group (Ellesse, Lacoste), Fila, ASICS, Mizuno and Saucony.

Environmental issues

Materials of concern to environmental campaigners include PVC as well as hazardous substances such as brominated flame retardants and triclosan. Those committed to or having already implemented a no PVC- policy include Nike, Adidas, Reebok, PUMA, New Balance and ASICS. No Sweat, Ethletic, Worn Again, Vegetarian Shoes are all PVC-free. Ethletic is the only trainer to have sourced Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified rubber for its soles and receives an extra product sustainability mark for this. Worn Again also receives an extra product sustainability mark because its trainers are all made from recycled fibres.

Nessie · 26-05-09, 13:18

Puma (fra Ellos)

Nessie · 26-05-09, 13:21

Adidas:

Acsa · 26-05-09, 20:10

Blackspot. Økologiske og antibrand og fagorganiserte arbeidere og stort bedre blir det ikke!

Fluke · 26-05-09, 20:27

Omtrent alt herfra:
http://www.vansproducts.eu/eu/index_womens.php

26-05-09, 11:05	#41
Candy Darling Prettiest mess ever seen Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Under ground Innlegg: 29.330 Blogginnlegg: 50	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Åh! De vil jeg ha! Hvor? __________________ Vi gjør alle så godt vi kan Og vi gjør alt feil. - No. 4 -

26-05-09, 11:06	#42
Candy Darling Prettiest mess ever seen Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Under ground Innlegg: 29.330 Blogginnlegg: 50	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Og hvis noen har noe dritt på Puma, så vil jeg ikke vite det. __________________ Vi gjør alle så godt vi kan Og vi gjør alt feil. - No. 4 -

26-05-09, 11:21	#43
Tallulah Glamorøs Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Innlegg: 60.214 Blogginnlegg: 640	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Det er noe dritt på alle sneakerprodusentene. __________________

26-05-09, 11:26	#44
Maverick Offline Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Oslo Innlegg: 50.838 Blogginnlegg: 1278	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Opprinnelig lagt inn av glitterchick, her. Det er noe dritt på alle sneakerprodusentene. Ssssh.

26-05-09, 11:27	#45
Tallulah Glamorøs Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Innlegg: 60.214 Blogginnlegg: 640	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Ethiscore hadde en test i fjor, tror jeg det var. Tror Adidas faktisk kom dårligere ut enn Nike. Siden er nede nå, så jeg får ikke sjekket. __________________

26-05-09, 11:28	#46
Maverick Offline Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Oslo Innlegg: 50.838 Blogginnlegg: 1278	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Altså, Glitter! Jammen.

26-05-09, 11:31	#47
Tallulah Glamorøs Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Innlegg: 60.214 Blogginnlegg: 640	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Jeg fant oversikten fra i fjor sommer: Gola trainers10.5 Puma trainers10 Saucony trainers9.5 Umbro trainers9.5 ASICS trainers9 Mizuno trainers9 New Balance trainers9 Ellesse trainers8.5 Skechers trainers8.5 Fila trainers8 Hi-Tec trainers8 Nike trainers8 Adidas trainers5.5 Brooks trainers5.5 Reebok trainers5.5 The ratings on this scorecard were last updated from our database at www.ethiscore.org on 22 May 2008. The higher the rating, the more ethical the brand. Puma er derfor ikke så ille. NB! Dette er trainers, ikke sneakers da, jeg har også sett en oversikt hvor flere grønne skomerker er representert. Ethletic blant annet. __________________

26-05-09, 11:59	#48
Tallulah Glamorøs Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Innlegg: 60.214 Blogginnlegg: 640	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Nå fant jeg listen over fashiontrainers / sneakers også, den er ganske lik, men da med noen andre helt på topp: Ethletic Trainers [A] [F]17 Blackspot sneaker [A] [O]16.5 No Sweat Hemp baseball boots [A] [O]15 Worn Again Trainer [S]14.5 No Sweat sneakers [A]14 VIVO Barefoot trainers Liu12.5 Gola trainers10.5 Puma trainers10 Umbro trainers9.5 ASICS trainers9 New Balance trainers9 Ellesse trainers8.5 Skechers trainers8.5 Fila trainers8 Hi-Tec trainers8 Nike trainers8 Adidas trainers5.5 Brooks trainers5.5 Reebok trainers5.5 __________________

26-05-09, 12:27	#49
Candy Darling Prettiest mess ever seen Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Under ground Innlegg: 29.330 Blogginnlegg: 50	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Men Puma har 10-ish på begge, som er ganske bra? __________________ Vi gjør alle så godt vi kan Og vi gjør alt feil. - No. 4 -

26-05-09, 12:34	#50
Tallulah Glamorøs Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Innlegg: 60.214 Blogginnlegg: 640	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Opprinnelig lagt inn av Scarlett, her. Men Puma har 10-ish på begge, som er ganske bra? Nja, relativt så er det jo det. Men på andre skalaer så ser man at bunnen er 10, så de har ikke alt på stell, nei. Sitat: We asked all the companies on the table for their supply chain policy. None of the major brands supplied us with a code that would receive our top rating as none has committed to paying workers “a living wage”. This is defined as one which for a full-time working week, without overtime, is enough for workers and their families to meet their needs for nutritious food, clean water, shelter, clothes, education, health care and transport and allows a small amount for discretionary spending.(2,3) Most companies state that they will pay “legal national minimum wages” or “industry benchmark standards”. The problem is that in many cases, neither come close to meeting basic needs.(3) In addition, many companies do not yet have adequate third-party monitoring in place. Some also use vague terms which can be interpreted in a number of ways - such as setting a maximum working week, “except in exceptional circumstances”. Where one is set, the maximum is most commonly 48 hours, plus 12 hours overtime. Some might argue that these hours are already excessive, and indeed the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Federation is campaigning for a 40 hour working week in developing countries. Violations Unfortunately, the existence of a code is no guarantee that it is being implemented. Violations of codes include excessive or forced overtime, inadequate wages, harassment and bullying of workers, discrimination and intimidation.(1,2,3) Violations have been found in factories supplying products for most of the companies on our table, including: Nike, Adidas, Puma, Skechers, New Balance, Reebok, Umbro, Pentland Group (Ellesse, Lacoste), Fila, ASICS, Mizuno and Saucony. Environmental issues Materials of concern to environmental campaigners include PVC as well as hazardous substances such as brominated flame retardants and triclosan. Those committed to or having already implemented a no PVC- policy include Nike, Adidas, Reebok, PUMA, New Balance and ASICS. No Sweat, Ethletic, Worn Again, Vegetarian Shoes are all PVC-free. Ethletic is the only trainer to have sourced Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified rubber for its soles and receives an extra product sustainability mark for this. Worn Again also receives an extra product sustainability mark because its trainers are all made from recycled fibres. __________________

26-05-09, 13:18	#51
Nessie Erfaren nok Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Trøndelag Innlegg: 39.853 Blogginnlegg: 351	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Puma (fra Ellos) __________________ Enten går det bra, eller så går det over.

26-05-09, 13:21	#52
Nessie Erfaren nok Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Trøndelag Innlegg: 39.853 Blogginnlegg: 351	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Adidas: __________________ Enten går det bra, eller så går det over.

26-05-09, 20:10	#53
Acsa Audacious Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: The immoral high ground Innlegg: 8.242 Blogginnlegg: 237	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Blackspot. Økologiske og antibrand og fagorganiserte arbeidere og stort bedre blir det ikke! __________________ 2001&2005

26-05-09, 20:27	#54
Fluke Bør lage seg en tittel selv Medlem siden: Sep 2006 Hvor: Rogaland Innlegg: 11.999 Blogginnlegg: 1	Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur Omtrent alt herfra: http://www.vansproducts.eu/eu/index_womens.php __________________ 02 10

Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur

Sv: Sneakers/basketsko/noe i den dur