De som ikke vaksinerer barna er ...

[Tallulah]

Opprinnelig lagt inn av tutta, her.

I en av av artiklene jeg refererte til var det et spesifikt eksempel fra Japan hvor spebarnsdødligheten/krybbedød har gått ned med 70% når en av komponentene i MMR-vaksinen ble forbudt.

Sitat:

The Japanese experience
Japan ceased compensation payments for SIDS when it moved the age for first vaccination to 24 months but the rate of SIDS remained the same at 1.2 per 1,000 births. The death rate from vaccine-preventable illness rose and Japan has since reintroduced vaccination at a younger age.

http://www.vaccination.org.au/questi...stion2123.html

Sitat:

In direct contradiction to Ms. Scheibner's claims, the official Japanese autopsy records on SIDS cases clearly demonstrate that the time interval from 1974-78, when pertussis immunization was delayed, saw the largest increase in the number of Japanese SIDS cases to that point in time. The annual number of SIDS cases recognized continued to climb thereafter, this despite a Japanese policy of not vaccinating children before the age of two years. IMPORTANT POINT:
The Japanese themselves have NEVER acknowledged or accepted Ms. Scheibner's claims. The Japanese have an advanced health care system noted for its health research contributions. It would seem reasonable to expect that if they had found the solution to the problem of SIDS they would have published this fact to the world.
* * This has never happened. * *
No Japanese study has ever made such a claim.
Instead, the Japanese are in full agreement with the rest of world when they state: "An inevitable conclusion of studies in the Netherlands, Great Britain, the United States and Japan is that sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is intimately linked to the prone sleeping position of infants."[7]
The Japanese also consider other legitimate risks for SIDS to be ". . . low birth weight, being a male infant, low maternal age, late order of birth in multiparity and illegitimacy." [8]
Further, it appears the Japanese have long since reversed themselves and moved to adopting the earlier infant immunization policy the rest of the world uses. The Japanese specifically recommend that "Mass administration of this vaccine (DPT) during infancy should be performed since about one-quarter of the patients with diphtheria, pertussis or tetanus were less than one year old." [9]
Thus, the evidence clearly demonstrates that Ms. Scheibner's claims of a pertussis vaccine/SIDS connection based on the Japanese experience is completely erroneous and without foundation in fact.

http://www.geocities.com/issues_in_i...japan_sids.htm

Sitat:

How do we know that they are false? Because a study4 was done on the autopsy records of infants (aged 1 week to 1 year old) who died in the Tokyo area. This study found that the number of SIDS cases rose continually from 1975 through 1993, the last year that the study considered. In fact, from 1979 to 1993, the number of SIDS cases in the Tokyo region increased by more than a factor of 125! Clearly, then, SIDS did not disappear from Japan once the vaccination age was raised. In fact, it increased considerably.

http://www.apologia.com/vaccines/vac_SIDS.html

Nå har ikke jeg bedrevet noen kildekritikk, men det tok meg ikke mange minuttene å finne temmelig mange artikler som motstrider det du sier. Artikler med mange kildehenvisninger til ulike studier. For å være gjennomtenkt og opplyst må du faktisk sette deg inn i dem også.